Prioritize detections
Reviewed medium- and high-severity alerts, affected hosts, users, timestamps, and confidence scores.
TryHackMe — Introduction to EDR
A practical SOC investigation of multiple endpoint detections using process lineage, command-line activity, file paths, network connections, indicators of compromise, MITRE ATT&CK context, and threat intelligence.
I worked as a SOC analyst at the simulated TECH THM organization with access to an EDR console containing multiple medium- and high-severity detections. The dashboard provided detection summaries, endpoint and user context, process trees, command lines, executable metadata, registry and network activity, IOC tables, confidence scores, and threat-intelligence labels.
The exercise focused on understanding and interpreting the visibility supplied by the EDR. Alert acknowledgement, containment, quarantine, and other response actions were outside the assigned scope.
My objective was to reconstruct what happened on each endpoint and answer precise triage questions with supporting evidence. This required identifying the tool used to download a payload, locating suspicious files, validating an exfiltration destination, and using threat intelligence to understand a detected utility.
Reviewed medium- and high-severity alerts, affected hosts, users, timestamps, and confidence scores.
Established what triggered each alert and identified the behavior that needed validation.
Followed parent-child relationships and command lines to reconstruct activity on the endpoint.
Compared executable paths, signatures, hashes, file activity, and user context.
Examined destination domains, IP addresses, URLs, and the purpose of outbound connections.
Connected file, domain, IP, hash, and URL indicators back to the process activity.
Used the EDR threat-intelligence label to distinguish known internal software from suspicious activity.
Recorded the evidence-backed answer for each alert without performing response actions.
A macro-enabled invoice document opened in Microsoft Word spawned CMD, which launched cURL to download a payload. The file was written to the Public folder but was not executed.
Process / activity chain
Evidence-backed findings
MITRE / investigation context: Initial Access · T1566.001 — Spearphishing Attachment
The investigation identified a suspicious syncsvc.exe running from a user Temp directory and communicating with an external file-transfer URL associated with an attempted dump-file upload.
Process / activity chain
Evidence-backed findings
MITRE / investigation context: Exfiltration · outbound transfer over a web service
A detection involving UpdateAgent.exe required context from the EDR threat-intelligence panel before a conclusion could be reached.
Process / activity chain
Evidence-backed findings
MITRE / investigation context: Contextual validation · internal utility identification
Downloaded payload
External download source / C2 indicator
External download connection
Unknown executable
Suspicious macro-enabled attachment
Suspicious Temp binary
Attempted exfiltration destination
CMD.exe launched CURL.exe on DESKTOP-HR01, and the payload was saved as C:\Users\Public\install.exe.
syncsvc.exe was located at C:\Users\haris.khan\AppData\Local\Temp\syncsvc.exe on WIN-ENG-LAPTOP03.
The outbound upload targeted files-wetransfer.com and referenced dump_2025.dmp in the URL path.
UpdateAgent.exe on DESKTOP-DEV01 was labelled a known internal IT utility tool.
The process chain revealed how a trusted Office application led to CMD and cURL, exposing the actual download behavior.
Public and Temp directories provided important context when evaluating downloaded or unfamiliar executables.
The complete destination URL made the attempted transfer and targeted dump file visible.
Threat intelligence showed that UpdateAgent.exe was an internal utility, demonstrating that an alert should not be judged by its name or severity alone.
This case study documents hands-on work completed in the TryHackMe Introduction to EDR room within a controlled simulation. It demonstrates my investigation method and understanding of EDR telemetry; it is not presented as production SOC employment.
The indicators shown here belong to the training scenario. In a live environment, I would preserve evidence, document confidence and impact, follow the organization’s escalation procedure, and coordinate authorized containment and remediation.